Dave's Top Eight

1. Jerry Reed...Revisited by Darrell Toney (reviewed 6/07) (5 Stars)
2. Sounds Like Sunday by Janet Paschal (reviewed 5/07) (5 Stars)
3. True To The Call by Kingdom Heirs (reviewed 3/07) (4 1/2 Stars)
4. Revival by Gold City (reviewed 10/06) (4 1/2 Stars)
5. Get Away Jordan by Ernie Haase & Signature Sound (reviewed 2/07) (4 1/2 Stars)
6. Breakin' Chains by Three Bridges (reviewed 5/07) (4 1/2 Stars)
7. Big Sky by The Isaacs (reviewed 4/07)
8. Skywriting by Mercy's Well (reviewed 7/07)

Click title to purchase at CBD.com...click artist name to read Dave's Review. A CD will automatically fall out of the Top Eight after twelve months if no CD surpasses it before then.

Most Recent Articles

Copyrights and fair use
New blog of the day
Hawaii Bids to Close Out Presidential Race
SGBlogNews
Singing News threatens legal action against AMGS p...
What about prayer and pre-destination?
In the details
God's knowledge vs. Human free will
I've gotta be nice now!
Grumble, grumble

I'mWithFred - Contribute Now

-----------

November 2, 2004

Great copyright resource

In addition to the links posted in my previous article on copyrights, I've found what appears to be another great resource on the topic . . . Brad Templeton's 10 Big Myths About Copyright. Templeton founded the first ever Dot Com in 1989, an online publishing company called ClariNet. He's no stranger to the issue. (I am, of course, just assuming his claims are legitimate since I have no way of knowing for sure.)

In particular, read myths 3, 4, 5 and 10.

Myths 3 and 4 helped me draw some conclusions to the questions had I posed. Quoting an entire copyrighted article on Usenet would most likely be seen as a violation, while quoting only a portion for purposes of commentary should fall under "fair use." Usenet is not "public domain." When in doubt, rephrase the information.

Myth 5 sheds some light on the following statement made by Singing News staffer Ken Kirksey in a posting on the AMGS newsgroup . . .
A number of copyright and trademark lawsuits have been lost because the copyright or trademark holder did not aggressively protect their intellectual property.
Templeton says that such protection might be required to defend a trademark, but not a copyright. Trademarks aren't always unique . . . Templeton mentions "apple" as a brand name for a computer, for example, yet the word "apple" itself has connotations outside the scope of the trademark. That's why a trademark must be protected more heavily than a copyright, which protects a unique combination of words.

Finally, Myth 10 makes it clear that getting an email doesn't entitle you to forward that email word for word to another forum or individual. You aren't required by law to honor privacy with emails, but it's certainly considered to be good form.


Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?